Contact Information: 231 State Office Building, 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155. Phone: (651) 296-6316. E-mail: rep.steve.gottwalt@house.mn.

Send an e-mail to this elected official using MCA’s quick & easy Desktop Lobbyist.

2006 MCA Candidate Survey Results: Candidate did not respond to survey.

Additional Notes from MCA: None.

Contact Information: 473 State Office Building, 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155. Phone: (651) 296-6612 or (800) 920-5884. E-mail: rep.larry.haws@house.mn.

Send an e-mail to this elected official using MCA’s quick & easy Desktop Lobbyist.

2006 MCA Candidate Survey Results:Candidate did not respond to survey.

Additional Notes from MCA: None.

Contact Information: 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Capitol Building, Room 208, St. Paul, MN 55155-1606. Phone: 651.296.6455.

Send an e-mail to this elected official using MCA’s quick & easy Desktop Lobbyist.

2006 MCA Candidate Survey Results:

1. Minnesota’s nearly 1600 non-profit arts and cultural organizations provide access to the arts and support quality of life in every corner of the state. While providing over 22,000 jobs, arts organizations served nearly 4.5 million people in 2004.
What arts activities have you attended, participated in or supported in the last year?
Check all that apply: Music, Theater, Visual Arts, Literary Arts, Dance, Other.

Answer: Music, Theater, Visual Arts, Literary Arts, Dance, Other.

2. Over the last three biennium the State Arts Board and Regional Arts Council appropriations were cut by 34.5%. These are substantially larger cuts than the cuts to the overall state budget. Would you support an increase in arts funding to restore the cuts that were made, in recognition of the important role the arts and culture play in our economy and in our quality of life? Select One: Enthusiastically Support, Support, Neutral, Opposed.

Answer: Enthusiastically Support

3. During the 2006 legislative session the legislature considered a constitutional dedication of funds for water, hunting and angling and various cultural purposes including the arts. Would you support a similar constitutional amendment in the 2007 legislative session? Select One: Yes, No, Don’t Know

Answer: No.

4. Research shows that students with high levels of arts participation outperform other students on virtually every measure from standardized tests to community participation, and that learning through the arts has a significant effect on learning in other areas, particularly in the early years. Would you support policies and funding to increase the availability of the arts in our schools? Select One: Enthusiastically Support, Support, Neutral, Opposed

Answer: Support.

5. We would welcome any additional comments you would like to make with regards to the arts in Minnesota.

Comments: Minnesota’s commitment to the arts is nationally known, but has come under threat because of state budget decisions in recent years. We need to get back to a partnership with arts organizations, with businesses, with schools, and with all Minnesotans who participate and contribute to the arts. Our quality of life, our economy, our children’s future opportunities all are important reasons I support the arts both personally and as a legislator.Q2: The arts are a key component of our economy and add a lot to our quality of life. I believe the cuts should not have been made and would be “Enthusiastic” in advocating for a restoration of the funding. Q3: In general, I believe we should be wary about changing our constitution and would have preferred the vote had been on the merits - rather than a constitutional one. I ultimately voted for it because of the combination the Senate included in it’s proposal - and the fact it would not have taken from other priorities if funded. In the next session I would still prefer the funding be done through the budget process rather than through a proposed amendment, but would likely vote “yes” again if there isn’t a direct legislative effort because of the good the potential funding would do.Q4: Yes- too many districts have had to make cuts in this area because of overall funding strains.

Additional Notes from MCA: None.

Send an e-mail to this elected official using MCA’s quick & easy Desktop Lobbyist.

2006 MCA Candidate Survey Results: Candidates did not respond to survey.

Additional notes from MCA: Governor Tim Pawlenty (GOP)

April, 2006 : In a statement made regarding the Senate passage of the proposed consitutional amendment on conservation, clean water, public broadcasting and the arts, Governor Pawlenty displayed his neglect of the value of the arts: “While I appreciate the Senate’s willingness to vote on this important issue, I hope the bill will be more focused in its final version. Conservation and clean water are too important to be watered down by other issues. While the arts and public broadcasting are important, they do not rise to the level of being in need of dedicated constitutional support.”

May, 2005: Governor Pawlenty vetoed a measure to create an official poet laureate in Minnesota, remarking: “Even though we have a state ‘folklorist’, I have concern that this will lead to calls for other similar positions. We could also see requests for a state mime, interpretive dancer, or potter…”. Minnesota would have joined its neighboring states North and South Dakota, Iowa, Illinois, and Wisconsin in having an official poet laureate if Pawlenty had not vetoed the bill.